City of Santa Monica won't mend their lending ways

The City of Santa Monica, CA and their fee-to-lend library have refused to rescind their subscription based policies. Reluctantly, today we have been forced to appeal to the publishers and licensors of the Library's collection and computing software systems to demand that the City of Santa Monica account for all lending and usage. Based on this accounting we have asked that the rights holders require their rightful royalty payments from the City of Santa Monica from the subscription and usage fees the City is collecting.

Our hope is that the considerable cost of the accounting and then the royalty payments to the publishers and licensors will cause the City to abandon this foolish and elitist tact of abandoning the American system of Free to Lend Public Libraries. For every book, every DVD, every CD, and every magazine there is a payment due to a rights holder. For every webpage, for every flash video, for every browser processed line of html, every document downloaded, and every email read - the Library collects a fee and so must pay the licensor.

It is ridiculous that the City and the Library ever chose to transfer the responsibility of their mismanaged pension obligations to the poor and working people of Southern California. Transfered the weight of their financial commitments to the thousands of minimum wage workers (and their families) who staff Santa Monica's hotels, restaurants, and retail establishments and who are denied free access to lending and internet access.

The letter to the publishers, generally, is as follows:

Recently the City of Santa Monica, California abandoned the American free-to-lend public library system and instituted a discriminatory subscription based system not seen in this country for over a century. If a member of the public is unable to produce proof of Santa Monica residency they must now pay a rental subscription fee for lending privileges and a daily fee to use “public” computers. 

Efforts to reverse this un-American policy have been ignored by the Santa Monica City Council. 

You are no doubt as bewildered and shocked by these actions as I was. I hope, as you considered these actions, you are as outraged as I have come to be. 

Santa Monica uses illegal redlining criteria to deny access. No exceptions to these subscription fees are even made for the thousands of southern California residents that work in the City’s substantial number of hotels, restaurants, and retail. No exceptions are made for these worker’s families. 

I strongly suspect that the City of Santa Monica has not been making payments to you out of the fees it is pocketing, has no accounting in place to calculate such amounts due you, and has not sought your permission to violate their usage agreement for the materials you sold and licensed them. 

You may know that the first circulating libraries in North America were private libraries that collected fees for membership and lending from which royalties were paid to publishers . It should be no surprise that the first circulating libraries were owned and/or operated by publishers. 

If there is any action any community could take to delineate the life of the haves and the haves not, truly the City of Santa Monica has taken it. Please join me in holding the City of Santa Monica accountable for discriminating against the greater Los Angeles working public.  Require that they account for fee based lending and information technology use. Demand that they make appropriate payments to your organization. Leave them no choice but to return to the centuries-old American Public Library system of free use and free lending. 

Thank you for your time, consideration, and efforts.

Contact: 

City of Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main St #200
Santa Monica, CA
(310) 393-9975

A Letter to City Hall

To:
        Gleam Davis, City Councilperson
        Kevin McKeown, City Councilperson
        Pam O'Connor, City Mayor
        Robert Holbrook, City Councilperson
        Ted Winterer, City Councilperson
        Terry O'Day, City Councilperson
        Tony Vazquez, City Councilperson
        Rod Gould, City Manager

25 August 2014


Recently you adopted discriminatory lending and access practices at the Santa Monica Public Library through subscription and use fees for materials, equipment, and services charged to the public who cannot produce evidence of Santa Monica residency. This policy fundamentally violates the principles and understanding of the American Public Library system of the free to access, free to lend, and free to read standard that the Los Angeles County and American public expects and demands and that the industry maintains throughout the state of California and this country.

Your policy violates the letter and spirit of much of the public and private funding that the City of Santa Monica has eagerly taken to construct facilities, obtain holdings, create and upgrade infrastructure, purchase equipment, and fund staff and staff endeavors today and in the recent past. Your policy profoundly violates the American right of equal opportunity and denies access to the thousands of service employees and their families of Los Angeles County that work in Santa Monica. Your policy compounds the disproportionate financial burden on all lower-economic status residents of Los Angeles County through the addition of these improper use fees on top of a variety of taxes already collected and paid to Santa Monica.

Please correct this policy of redlining immediately and begin the process of refunding all fees collected through this policy in the immediate future.

david